W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > July to August 1996

Re: <EMBED> (fwd)

From: Scott Porad <porad@smallworld.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 12:09:24 -0500
Message-Id: <199608281601.MAA17847@smallworld.com>
To: www-talk@w3.org


Someone asked:

>>> Does any of you know if I can use the ALT= keyword in an <EMBED SRC=> tag
>>> as I do in <IMG SRC=>, or can not?

Then another replied:

>><EMBED> is obsolete.  The W3C has standardized on <OBJECT> for that

And a third said:

>Except of course that Netscape supports EMBED and does not yet support OBJECT.
>Minor point - except that the vast majority of browsers in use as NS.

And I would like to comment/ask:

MSIE supports <EMBED>, although they say in their spec:

     OBJECT is the preferred element for inserting objects, but EMBED
     is included for backward compatibility with earlier HTML documents.

Which brings up an interesting point from a practical point of view:  which
to use <EMBED> or <OBJECT>?  Obviously, <OBJECT> is the correct thing, but
has anyone figured out a short-term solution (until Netscape gets with the
program) short of making pages and then having to rebuild them?

Scott

-------------------------------------------------------
Scott Porad                        Small World Software
porad@smallworld.com               171 West 85th Street
Voice: (212) 501-9800                New York, NY 10024
Fax:   (212) 501-9816         http://www.smallworld.com
        "Shrink the World, Expand Your Mind"
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 1996 12:08:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:19 GMT