In message <199607172326.QAA29327@web1.calweb.com>, "Lee Daniel Crocker" writes :, >That's great for meta-data, and I hope it becomes popular, but >updating URLs isn't really a meta-data issue. It's more like >a link-relationship issue, I think. I'd like to see indexers >like Yahoo understand <link rev=supersedes href=...> to update >their links automatically, as well as others. Good idea. This sort of thing was discussed at a recent W3C workshop. See: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Search/9605-Indexing-Workshop/ and in particular: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Search/9605-Indexing-Workshop/ReportOutcomes/index.html >As for how to get webmasters to follow a convention (no small >problem), I think right now that a few commercial folks like >Yahoo and AltaVista have 10x more power than W3C does to make >that happen. If Yahoo used this one feature to keep its >links up to date, I think everyone would follow. That's why we got the search vendors in the room to hash this stuff out! DanReceived on Thursday, 18 July 1996 15:26:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:38:39 GMT