W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-talk@w3.org > July to August 1995

Re: test of new Location header usage

From: Rob Hartill <hartill@ooo.lanl.gov>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 95 9:46:04 MDT
Message-Id: <199508091546.AA143183164@ooo.lanl.gov>
To: decoux@moulon.inra.fr
Cc: www-talk@w3.org
 
>  Only historical reason : the first spec (CGI 1.0) defined only `Content-type'
> and `Location'. `Status' was added for CGI 1.1
> 
>  I don't know why you want add a status code, when Location imply a code 302.

Location doesn't necessarily imply "302". "301" is prefectly acceptable,
and preferably in many cases.


rob
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 1995 11:48:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:14:18 GMT