Date: Thu, 9 Jul 92 18:50:36 MET DST From: timbl (Tim Berners-Lee) Message-Id: <9207091650.AA20803@ nxoc01.cern.ch > To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: HyTime in WWW? Cc: email@example.com If there is a hytime construct which is better than what we have then I'd be very happy to get it included in the next format. We just need some people to work on that format formally. Basically, anything which worries you is going to worry us just as much! There is a mailing list ww-announce, and another www-talk. How to join ius on the web (under "mailing lists"). Annocuncements are (too) rare, talk is sometimes heavy, sometimes not. Tim ____ >From firstname.lastname@example.org Thu Jul 9 16:14:32 1992 Return-Path: <email@example.com> Received: from dxmint.cern.ch by nxoc01.cern.ch (NeXT-1.0 (From Sendmail 5.52)/NeXT-2.0) id AA20246; Thu, 9 Jul 92 16:14:27 MET DST Received: by dxmint.cern.ch (dxcern) (5.57/3.14) id AA26395; Thu, 9 Jul 92 16:14:01 +0200 Received: from kong.gsfc.nasa.gov by lego.gsfc.nasa.gov (5.61/1.35) id AA22531; Thu, 9 Jul 92 10:13:33 -0400 Received: by kong.gsfc.nasa.gov (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA02563; Thu, 9 Jul 92 10:13:30 EDT From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Cliff Joslyn) Message-Id: <9207091413.AA02563@kong.gsfc.nasa.gov> Subject: Re: HyTime in WWW? To: email@example.com (Tim@GIBBS.GSFC.NASA.GOV Berners-Lee) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 92 10:13:29 EDT In-Reply-To: <9207090441.AA19281@ nxoc01.cern.ch >; from "Tim@GIBBS.GSFC.NASA.GOV Berners-Lee" at Jul 9, 92 6:41 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11] Status: R > I have to admit that although I have skip-read HyTime I am not > an expert. Charles Goldfarb suggested we write a generic HyTime > engine, but my impression was that most of HyTime we didn't > want (Finite coodinate systems, for example). Yes, us too. But my impression is that the INTENTION of HyTime is to be able to use whichever portions are appropriate. Certainly hypertext-only applications were envisioned. Personally, I think that HyTime's alinks are the most elegant link structures I've seen. They're completely generic n-ary relations. The gain would be standard adherence for long-run compatibility. I'd hate to start marking our nodes up in your HTML only to find it's of limitted compatibility with the world 10 years from now. Thanks for the reply. I'm glad that Newcomb is involved. What's the best way to keep informed about how W3 is proceedingd? Just periodically reading the "What's New" node? Or do you have a separate pamil or email list? O-----------------------------------------------------------------------------> | Cliff Joslyn, Cybernetician at Large, 327 Spring St #2 Portland ME 04102 USA | Systems Science, SUNY Binghamton NASA Goddard Space Flight Center | firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com | ^^^^^^ !NOTE NEW EMAIL! ^^^^^^ V All the world is biscuit shaped. . .