- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:46:23 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2015-02-15 23:38, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Over the last few years*, we've seen a considerable amount of pressure to compromise encryption from some parts of industry. For example, in HTTPbis we had several discussions of the role of a proxy in HTTP, including the now-infamous "trusted proxy" proposal <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-loreto-httpbis-trusted-proxy20-01> which has been discarded. > ... <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-loreto-httpbis-trusted-proxy20-01#section-1.1>: > The main aim for this document is to analyse and define the role of > an Explicit and Trusted proxy for HTTP URI resources transported over > HTTP2 with TLS. So, no, AFAIU that was not a proposal that would have affected https at all. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 16 February 2015 12:46:55 UTC