- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:01:25 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
>1) That seems like an oversimplification of the problem given the lengthy discussion here: >https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 The "length" of the discussion is because we have NO consensus in the Media TF if HTTPS: should be mandatory. I am really surprised that you would draw any conclusion simply for the "length" of the discussion. The best that can said about Bug 26332 is that there are passionate proponents of BOTH sides of the argument. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: annevankesteren@gmail.com [mailto:annevankesteren@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 5:29 PM To: Mark Watson Cc: Domenic Denicola; Henri Sivonen; www-tag Subject: Re: Comments on the EME opinion On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote: > In practice there's no reason for EME in browsers to be any more > privacy sensitive than regular cookies. 1) That seems like an oversimplification of the problem given the lengthy discussion here: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26332 2) I'm pretty sure that if we did cookies today we'd restrict them. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2014 06:01:55 UTC