- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:43:28 +0200
- To: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Cc: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote: > I refer you to the normative reference policy. :) I'm really not trying to > cycle this argument over and over, but this is a major change to a policy > and the W3C's way of working, and it should be treated as such; not a > disagreement about one simple, relatively non-contentious reference. So what about the other normative references to unstable documents? Such as publicsuffix.org? Or the xiph.org wiki? Or some IETF draft on MIME Sniffing that's expired (there's a maintained WHATWG standard...)? If that's an actual policy, they sure seem to be rather anti-WHATWG in enforcing it. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 17:44:00 UTC