- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:50:30 +0200
- To: Paul Libbrecht <paul@hoplahup.net>
- Cc: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Paul Libbrecht <paul@hoplahup.net> wrote: > I did not talk about *speccing* DTDs (oh boy!). Neither did Michael I believe. Mike talked about publishing new DTDs under TR. Seems like speccing to me. > I disagree implied attributes are a misfeature and, while processing external subsets was optional, it has been always performed and has been a faithful way to perform namespace mixes. Processing external subsets is optional. > So… are you telling us you want spec-makers to not produce XML collections anymore? I'm not sure what "XML collections" means, so I can't answer. > Or you prefer that we happily ignore the namespace features of XML the way HTML5 has done it (meaning… you push the art of mixing to the spec writers and readers)? I prefer that you make an editor (or system input method; see Typinator for Mac) macro for inputting those terrible URLs into your XML source explicitly. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@hsivonen.fi https://hsivonen.fi/
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 09:50:57 UTC