- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:46:41 +0000
- To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- Cc: Konstantinov Sergey <twirl@yandex-team.ru>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com> wrote: > I admit the bit where they hand a URL in is a bit of a fudge. I noted > somewhere (can't' recall where) that they should have a generic (string? > JSON?) payload and let apps do as they will (modulo size limits for the > payload). But with that problem of generality solved, the overall thing > becomes transport agnostic, and I should point out, with respect to the > underlying message delivery system, started that way. > > This is a non-issue WRT their current draft, IMO. I agree with Tim that punting on what protocol is going to be implemented across actors would be unacceptable. Whether we define them in the same draft or via reference is a technicality not worth worrying about, but there has to be a baselines that is guaranteed to work. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 7 January 2014 11:47:15 UTC