- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 23:24:43 -0400
- To: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>, Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
I assumed it was some kind of inside joke about the great Scotch tartan forgery of 1842 by the Sobieski Stuart brothers: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestiarium_Scoticum But I have no idea really. That's all I found on google. Whatever it's about I expect it will be resolved off line, since this is not a legal forum, so it doesn't belong here. David On 08/15/2014 10:46 PM, Eric J. Bowman wrote: > Wait, what? You claim misconduct but don't actually state what said > misconduct construed. If it's supposed to be self-evident from the > quoted messages, you've lost me, and your posts here come across as > noise, and a major waste of time for the likes of EFF and EPIC. > > Anyone who knows WTF this is even *about* please feel free to contact me > off-list and bring me up to speed. > > -Eric > > On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:04:57 +0000 > Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> Adobe Corporation, >> >> >> >> >> >> I describe to you a serious misconduct of Larry Masinter, >> representing Adobe Corporation at the W3C in an official capacity. I >> describe to you a serious misconduct of Adobe Corporation. Be >> advised that numerous attorneys, including but not limited to, at the >> Electronic Frontier Foundation and Electronic Privacy Information >> Center have been apprised of the incident. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Adam Sobieski >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Adam Sobieski >> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 9:52 AM >> To: Larry Masinter, Daniel Appelquist, www-tag@w3.org >> Cc: Electronic Frontier Foundation, barnes@epic.org, Barbara Simons >> >> >> >> >> >> Larry Masinter, >> >> >> >> >> I take strong issue with your accusation and the gross misconduct of >> the W3C Technical Architecture Group. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Larry Masinter >> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 2:33 AM >> To: Daniel Appelquist, www-tag@w3.org >> >> >> >> >> >> I'd suggested a candidate panel discussion or Q&A, but the question >> was "where?". 'www-tag' might not be the best venue, but it's >> probably more relevant than the Sobieski hoax. (for which you should >> consider >> http://www.cmu.edu/research-compliance/report-problem/index.html). >> >> Larry >> -- >> http://larry.masinter.net >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Daniel Appelquist [mailto:appelquist@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:02 PM >>> To: TAG List >>> Subject: Status Updates >>> >>> This week I am working on getting the URL spec publishing pipeline >>> working. Robin has been good enough to set it up - now I just need >>> to figure out how it works such that we can publish a fpwd. >>> >>> I am going to open up general registration for the extensible web >>> summit Berlin tomorrow and will publicise accordingly from @w3ctag >>> and on the blog. >>> >>> Election-wise, I am trying to get the candidacy statements made >>> public and I will publish a blog post when that happens. >>> >>> I have asked Philippe to help set up what needs to be set up for the >>> promises guide. Domenic, expect a contact. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dan > > > >
Received on Saturday, 16 August 2014 03:25:11 UTC