Re: Packaging on the Web specification

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:04 PM, ashok malhotra
<ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>wrote:

> Hi Jeni:
> A couple of quick comments:
>
> 1.  MHTML is a packaging format.  Why is it not suitable?  Need to say
> something about it.
>

There's no standard for it, AFAICT.


> 2. ZIP has lossless compression.  That's part of its popularity. Can we do
> compression?
>

Yes, either at the transport layer over the entire package or over the
individual item level. I think it'll be up to content-type aware tools to
figure out which they're going to do by default early-on in the lifetime of
the format.


> 3. Would it be possible to create a streamable version of ZIP?
>

Perhaps, and this was discussed at length, but it has considerable
downsides and still requires extra metadata that needs an additional
standard (mimetype, e.g.).


> Best, Ashok
>
>
> On 4/6/2014 5:25 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve worked up a proper spec for Packaging on the Web, speccing both a
>> format (application/package) and a link relation (rel=package) and
>> providing some detailed scenarios and examples.
>>
>> It’s at: http://w3ctag.github.io/packaging-on-the-web/
>>
>> Feedback greatly appreciated. In particular, Yehuda, you said you’d
>> review?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jeni
>> --
>> Jeni Tennison
>> http://www.jenitennison.com/
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 10 April 2014 22:45:09 UTC