www-tag@w3.org from October 2013 by author

Allen Wirfs-Brock

Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Anne van Kesteren

Halloween minutes (Thursday, 31 October)
Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: Is <object classid="[flash]"...> the relevant precedent? (Wednesday, 23 October)
Re: XHR vs JSON, was: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: XHR vs JSON, was: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)

Appelquist Daniel (UK)

Re: Call for Nominations to W3C Technical Architecture Group (TAG) (Wednesday, 30 October)
FW: Call for Nominations to W3C Technical Architecture Group (TAG) (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: Perma.cc Announcement (Tuesday, 29 October)
Perma.cc Announcement (Tuesday, 29 October)
Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Thursday, 17 October)
Draft F2F Minutes Available (Thursday, 10 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Arthur Barstow

Re: FW: Call for Nominations to W3C Technical Architecture Group (TAG) (Wednesday, 30 October)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

Re: XHR vs JSON, was: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: XHR vs JSON, was: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: XHR vs JSON, was: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: XHR vs JSON, was: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Wednesday, 9 October)

Brian Kardell

Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: XHR vs JSON, was: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Carsten Bormann

Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Douglas C rockford

Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)

Douglas Crockford

Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)

Eric J. Bowman

Re: Unrestricted publishing in EME? Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: (Monday, 28 October)

Henri Sivonen

Re: Unrestricted publishing in EME? Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: (Wednesday, 30 October)
Re: Unrestricted publishing in EME? Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: (Monday, 28 October)
Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: Is <object classid="[flash]"...> the relevant precedent? (Wednesday, 23 October)

Henry S. Thompson

Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: Is <object classid="[flash]"...> the relevant precedent? (Friday, 25 October)
DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: Is <object classid="[flash]"...> the relevant precedent? (Tuesday, 22 October)

Herbert van de Sompel

Re: Link rot in Supreme Court decisions (Thursday, 10 October)

Jeni Tennison

TAG telcon of 2013-10-10 -- Draft minutes (Thursday, 10 October)

John Cowan

Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Jorge Chamorro

Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Jorge Chamorro Bieling

Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Julian Reschke

XHR vs JSON, was: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)

Konstantinov Sergey

Re: Call for Nominations to W3C Technical Architecture Group (TAG) (Wednesday, 30 October)

L. David Baron

Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: Is <object classid="[flash]"...> the relevant precedent? (Wednesday, 23 October)

Larry Masinter

RE: Link rot in Supreme Court decisions (Wednesday, 9 October)
FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Martin J. Dürst

Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)

Noah Mendelsohn

Yet another browser (or yet again a browser) (Wednesday, 2 October)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Philippe Le Hegaret

Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: Is <object classid="[flash]"...> the relevant precedent? (Thursday, 24 October)

Tatu Saloranta

Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Technical Architecture Group Issue Tracker

ISSUE-68 (JSON-FU): Potential Discrepancies between IETF JSON and ECMA JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Tim Berners-Lee

Re: Unrestricted publishing in EME? Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: (Tuesday, 29 October)
Unrestricted publishing in EME? Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: (Sunday, 27 October)

Tim Bray

Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: Next Steps on JSON + Proposed TAG Resolution (Friday, 18 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Wednesday, 9 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)
Re: [Json] FYI ECMA, W3C, IETF coordination on JSON (Tuesday, 8 October)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2013 17:45:15 UTC