W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Why polyglot is needed

From: Daniel Appelquist <dan@bluevia.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:01:43 +0000
To: <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD6F384E.7032%dan@bluevia.com>
On 20/03/2013 01:18, "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
wrote:

>[...] On the other hand, I still believe a polyglot document is useful.
>I've
>explained that it is useful for companies and organisations where english
>isn't a language routinely used by the people who have to do the relevant
>work, and where there are XML toolchains in use.
>
>I don't think this is an architectural issue and I don't think the TAG
>should be spending their time on it. It's a deployent issue, that falls in
>the scope of the HTML WG... [...]

For what it's worth: +1 to the above.  ("Yes" to a polyglot spec being
useful to some communities. "No" to a TAG work item on polyglot.)

Dan
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:02:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:02:20 GMT