W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Polyglot as a generic version transition technique

From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:46:10 -0700
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20130213224610.269ef280f6fce50c35098929@bisonsystems.net>
Larry Masinter wrote:
> I had a recent insight about polyglot.

Interesting.  By your definition, the solution I'm advocating here:


Is to make a "polyglot API" instead of using conneg/versioning.

> However, in 2013, the important use case for Polyglot is to allow the
> transitionfrom XHTML (the previous W3C Recommendation path) to HTML. 

Except you lose me there, in that I would say the use case for PG is to
allow the coexistence of HTML and XHTML.  Otherwise we're deprecating
stream processing on the Web, enabled by application/xhtml+xml, which
still seems like a desirable architectural feature for those who know
how to exploit it.

Received on Thursday, 14 February 2013 05:46:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:19 UTC