W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2013

Re: IndexedDB, what were the issues? How do we stop it from happening again?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:28:26 -0500
Message-ID: <5119000A.5050707@openlinksw.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org
On 2/10/13 5:37 PM, Miko Nieminen wrote:
> Sorry for dropping previous content in this thread, but I just
> subscribed to this list and the only way I found to reply to older
> messages is by using archives and "respond to this message" link.
>
> It seems that people criticize IndexedDB quite a lot and I don't quite
> agree with most of the criticism. I have been playing with IDB for
> couple of months now I actually quite like it. It has its shortcomings,
> but I think NoSQL database is very good choice as browser based
> database and there are multiple reasons why I favour this approach over
> embedding SQL DBMS.

It isn't an either or proposition. Each API serves different kinds of 
data access needs. As you say, IndexedDB works fine once you understand 
its problem space focus :-)

> [SNIP]


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 14:28:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 11 February 2013 14:28:49 GMT