- From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:43:10 -0500
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Le 7 févr. 2013 à 10:28, Marcos Caceres a écrit : > I don't understand "made by the branding on the spec more than by the reality of interactions and sources"? People say: "Oh it's an ugly API! Yeah for sure, it is designed by $ORG. This is a proof that design by committee is bad." What I'm saying is that a spec published at $ORG is orthogonal to the "design by committee" rant. Some will be edited by one person, some by a group, some will be good, some will be bad. In the case of Web Alarm API, it seems it is a DRAFT (important to not) which has been inspired by a spec from one specific vendor without modifications. And… the 1st DRAFT. So why should it be perfect from the start? but I digress. Agreed with the rest of the email about indexedDB and identifying the patterns. -- Karl Dubost http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 15:43:12 UTC