- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:27:55 +1000
- To: Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>
- Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, www-tag@w3.org
On 13 Oct 2012, at 01:41, Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net> wrote: > Creative Commons says you should (i.e. they think it is a norm to) use > xhv:license. See http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC_REL What I pointed out was what W3C Groups did. It would be nice to know that the TAG acknowledged such prior work. Also, given that CC use both "license" and "cc:morePermissions" to point to license info, they seem to be inconsistent. > I think I was the one to recommend that a document > coming from the TAG ought to recognize CC as an authority and use > xhv:license. I am not arguing against this property, I am pointing out other W3C group views. And the licensing world is bigger than just CC. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 05:28:31 UTC