W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2012

[Fwd: Microdata as W3C Note vs. W3C Rec.]

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:09:13 +0000
Message-ID: <50B50FD9.3030009@webr3.org>
To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
FYI, it's been proposed that Microdata be published as a NOTE rather 
than Rec track, since it's moving (or moved) to CR.

Related to:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2011Jun/0038.html


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Microdata as W3C Note vs. W3C Rec.
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:57:48 +0000
Resent-From: public-html-comments@w3.org
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:57:20 -0800
From: Eric Franzon <eric@semanticweb.com>
To: public-html-comments@w3.org

Hello all,

As an AC Rep (for SemanticWeb.com) and as someone who regularly 
interacts with developers just being introduced to Semantic Web concepts 
for the first time, I am writing to state my agreement with the position 
outlined by Manu Sporny in this post:
http://manu.sporny.org/2012/microdata-cr/

Moving Microdata forward toward recommendation status adds confusion in 
an area already rife with confusion. I believe that Microdata should be
published as a W3C Note.

Best,
--Eric

-- 
*Eric Axel Franzon*
Vice President of Community
SemanticWeb.com
6080 Center Dr., 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90045

eric@semanticweb.com

LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/ericfranzon
Twitter: http://twitter.com/SemanticWeb
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 19:10:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 November 2012 19:10:21 GMT