W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Should specifications take sides in the httpRange-14 debate?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:39:53 +0000
To: St├ęphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5b3903uquu.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Work continues within the TAG on this issue [1].  On current course
and speed, I expect hash URIs will be just fine.  My personal take on
the likely TAG position is that no community of practice with respect
to URI use on the Semantic Web can or will be declared to be
"losers".  The goal of the current work is to foster interoperability,
not mandate a single "winner".

Hope this helps,

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/defininguris.html
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 11:40:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 November 2012 11:40:19 GMT