W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2012

ACTION-746: Raise a bug on registerContentHandler and registerProtocolHandler to ask for specification of how fragids are handled

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 18:49:19 +0000
Message-Id: <196507BC-D1BF-4627-9C60-B9BB9FD4DE78@jenitennison.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>

I took on raising this bug when you raised it as an issue during the F2F. Looking at the spec text at


I can't see that anything needs to change. The URL "templates" that are passed into the registerContentHandler() and registerProtocolHandler() functions don't seem to be restricted, and the URL that's constructed by replacing the %s in the template is navigated to in the same way as a URL in a @href attribute, with fragment identifiers managed in the same way.

What did you think the section needs to say about fragment identifiers?

Jeni Tennison
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 18:49:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:17 UTC