W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2012

Re: F2F planning and next steps on fragids and media types

From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 20:43:12 -0400
Message-ID: <4FC41BA0.9050001@arcanedomain.com>
To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>

On 5/28/2012 5:31 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>> Notes/questions:
>> >
>> >  	 I will put Fragids and Mime types on the agenda, with a placeholder for a new draft as required reading. If you have any other "framing" material you'd like in the agenda text, please let me know.
> The draft is at:
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids-2012-05-28.html

Terrific, thank you!

> There's no other framing material although a link back to the discussion at the April F2F wouldn't be bad.
>> >  	 Should we have opened a successor action to 690, per the underlined note above?
> Yes, I was supposed to but it was only going to be to create the draft which I've done and is above. Would it help for me to create the action and mark it PENDING REVIEW or are you happy enough with the above notice?

Just now, it's not essential as I will know to schedule for the F2F. In 
general, it's good if we have at least one action capturing the status and 
next expected checkpoint of each ongoing project, as that's what I use to 
inform my telcon schedules. So, let's just be sure actions are appropriate 
coming out of the F2F, and for now don't worry about it.

>> >  	 Do you expect to want discussion of action-672 at the F2F?
> I doubt we'll need discussion of ACTION-672; it can be handled by email at the moment I think.

OK. I'll leave it to you to initiate any threads as appropriate. Thank you 

Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 00:43:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:15 UTC