Re: Media typing of fragments

On Mon, 7 May 2012, Robin Berjon wrote:

>> Certainly that first paragraph is paraphrasing RFC 3986, not providing 
>> a narrowed view relating to media fragments. So, if what's intended is 
>> the narrower reading you suggest, I think it needs to be worded much 
>> more clearly. In context, it appears to be a tutorial on Web 
>> architecture, as the first paragraph seems to be in any case.
>
> I don't think that it is intended as a tutorial on Web architecture 
> (which would be a strange thing to include there), rather I think that 
> they are explaining how one chooses between the two large options they 
> standardise to access media fragments. It is built on existing 
> architecture but does not (re)define it.

It is definitely not a clarification of the URI spec, but as Robin pointed 
out, something relative to media fragments only (and in that case to video 
media fragments). It is still time to request a clarification to the WG, 
as some other clarifications/editorial changes were made in the PR phase 
(and even a bit after).

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves