Re: Classification of ISSUE-57 change proposals

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net> wrote:
> I've put the ISSUE-57 proposals into the following categories, based
> on the way I analyze the issue:
>
> 1. Always-content  - the representation can be assumed to be content.
> (3 proposals)
> 2. Content opt-out  - the representation can be assumed to be content
> unless indicated otherwise. (2)
> 3. Content opt-in    - the representation cannot be assumed to be
> content absent other information. (5)
> 4. Other (1)
>
> I've tried to cast a wide net and include proposals that have come up
> even if they don't use the change proposal template or aren't fully
> baked.
>
> The list is here: http://www.w3.org/wiki/TagIssue57Responses
>
> Noah: I'll try to take a snapshot for reference from the agenda.
>
> Jonathan

Today's version of the wiki page now linked from the agenda. Apologies
to those who have submitted revisions I haven't picked up on, or
proposals that I didn't get around to adding.

Jonathan

Received on Friday, 30 March 2012 14:49:34 UTC