W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [apps-discuss] "Best Practices for Fragment Identifiers and Media Type Definitions"

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:17:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZ0o5Q3CCiGYFTSNPCV5CSf7SCCFXAZ2c7Q0Y9+VRN60w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote:

> To be more explicit (and provide additional URLs):
>
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/fragid-best-practices/ is now (as of last week) a
> W3C "First Public Working Draft" as the first step of the "Recommendation"
> track at W3C.
> The W3C TAG plan for moving this to Recommendation is
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/fragids.html
>
> (a) comments on the document itself should be sent to www-tag@w3.org.
> Please note that the latest 'editor draft' is
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mimeTypesAndFragids.
>
> (b) it is likely too late to affect draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs
>
> (c) Perhaps a reference to it from
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs (as
> an informative source of considerations an expert reviewer might take into
> account) would be in order.
>
>
Is there any objection from the WG to making a reference to this in the
suffix-regs document?  (Perhaps before we go there: Is that first
w3.orgURI going to be a permanent URI to which we could make
reference?)

-MSK
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 11:37:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 31 July 2012 11:37:33 GMT