W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2012

Official Response to ISSUE-84 from RDF Web Apps WG

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:33:10 -0500
Message-ID: <4F243156.6020105@digitalbazaar.com>
CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
bcc: www-tag

Hi Jeni,

Thank you for your public feedback on the RDFa 1.1 documents. This is an
official response from the RDF Web Apps WG to your issue before we enter
the 3rd Last Call for the RDFa 1.1 work this coming Tuesday. The Last
Call will last for 3 weeks, so there is still time for you to discuss
your concerns if we have not fully addressed them.

Your issue was tracked here:

https://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/84

Explanation of Issue
--------------------

The W3C TAG has been concerned about the discussion of fragment
identifiers in the RDFa Core 1.1 specification. We have tried to apply
changes, suggested by the TAG, to the document over the past year to
address these concerns. Most recently, you submitted new text to make
the issue of minting new IRIs using fragment identifiers a little more
clear.

Working Group Decision
----------------------

RESOLVED: Adopt the WWW TAG proposed language on fragment identifiers
and place it into RDFa Core 1.1

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-01-19#resolution_1

We have accepted your suggestion in full.

Feedback
--------

Since this is an official Working Group response to your issue, we would
appreciate it if you responded to this e-mail and let us know if the
decision made by the group is acceptable to you as soon as possible.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout
http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 17:33:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:44 GMT