W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2012

Re: Fw: CfC: Close ISSUE-177: ietf-id-wip by Amicable Resolution

From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:52:27 +0900
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120126205226.GB11933@sideshowbarker>
Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, 2012-01-26 05:52 -0800:

> this html-wg issue concerns whether an undated url reference to another
> specification is labeled as "work in progress" so that reviewers are
> alerted to the loose binding.
> is that just a matter of taste with no substance?

Maybe you can point out to me how actual behavior of conforming UAs that
implement the spec would be affected by the proposed change.

If you have time, maybe you can look at the following and point out what
effect its resolution would have on conforming UAs -

  Consider reducing verbosity when talking about code points

The change proposed there requires literally hundreds of edits to the
current spec.


Michael[tm] Smith
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:52:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:13 UTC