W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2012

Re: HTML5 proposes introduction of new family of URI schemes

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:57:29 +0100
Message-ID: <4F1ED4E9.1060701@gmx.de>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2012-01-24 16:50, Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 00:29 , Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2012-01-24 00:07, Robin Berjon wrote:
>>> I don't think so. At this point no one has shown that the two are equivalent, and examples attempting to prove that they are use schemes like "web+imageedit" (as in web+imageedit:example.org/unicorn.png) which I'm thinking ought to make anyone who cares about web architecture scream rather loudly :
>>
>> I agree. But the fact that you, me, and probably almost everybody who's subscribed to this mailing list agree on this won't prevent this from happening. It didn't prevent itms: and webcal: either.
>
> In this case I was talking about work that's taking place in a W3C task force that's producing Rec-track material which wasn't the case for itms: or webcal:. One can hope that somewhere along the process if the above gains traction there'll be some push-back :)

Hmm? The programmers out there who are going to define these schemes 
most likely aren't active in W3C or IETF...
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 15:58:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:44 GMT