W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2012

Re: TAG response to your comments on "Issues of concern to the TAG"

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:29:42 +0000
Message-ID: <4F4355F6.6030203@ninebynine.org>
To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
CC: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
On 20/02/2012 22:42, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
>> Among many other important concerns, the impact on the W3C
>> specifications level needs to be assessed."
> We agree. We expect that individual working groups should take the lead in
> dealing with impact on particular specifications, and as noted above, the
> TAG will continue to play an oversight role, being alert for new issues, or
> for impact on specifications that others are missing.

The IETF has a principle that all specifications should have a "security 
considerations" section that at least aims to set out known security concerns, 
and where possible to indicate mitigation.  Is it time for W3C to adopt a 
similar principle?

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 08:39:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:13 UTC