W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Comments on "Providing and Discovering Definitions of URIs"

From: Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:57:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGnGFMLMF3uBLcB9d15-doOcnZ2imnn5JKZOtvUZfUUz+5k28A@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Cc: www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:50 AM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 08:46 -0500, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
>> [ . . . ] I may do another round of edits to
>> "Providing" but I will spend most of my allocated time on
>> "Understanding" and not on its supporting material - as I say it's at
>> a point of diminishing returns. I'm sorry if my last request for
>> review was misleading on this account.
>
> I am okay with leaving the "Providing" document as is, with three small
> but important exceptions, since that document is explicitly held out as
> providing the criteria on which httpRange-14 change proposals will be
> judged:
> [[
> Change proposals should address relevant questions and issues presented
> in "Providing and discovering definitions of URIs" which is a review of
> the design space. Proposals may be based on material in this document if
> desired. Proposals that in the editor's or TAG's judgment do not address
> points in this document when appropriate will be returned for revision.
> ]]

This part of the call is what I plan to change, at least.
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 14:58:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:45 GMT