- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:57:27 -0400
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, john+ietf@jck.com, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, tony+mtsuffix@maillennium.att.com
On 4/13/2012 6:34 AM, Jeni Tennison wrote: > If we wanted to use that with XSLT, we would need to say so within the application/xslt+xml media type definition and deal with the fact that the syntax clashed with XPointer syntax inherited through the use of the +xml suffix. Shouldn't we consider some overall advice as to whether generic semantics, with the goal of enabling generic processing based only on the top-level type is highly desirable in all cases/OK to selectively break in particular derived type specs/a completely false goal? Noah
Received on Friday, 13 April 2012 20:57:56 UTC