- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:45:00 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F78B03C.3070405@openlinksw.com>
On 4/1/12 12:55 PM, David Booth wrote: > This last requirement is necessary because we need to decide how to > handle the case of the 10^11 web pages for which the URI owner has not > explicitly said anything about how the page's URI should be > interpreted. What the URI says doesn't really matter. The moment a URI exists it identifies something. That's it. If the thing in question is a Web Resource, in the most basic scenario it is endowed with content that may or may note constitute representation for self, description of some other entity, or definition of some other entity. All we know is that URIs might resolve to content. We don't need anything else -- on a mandatory basis -- from the publisher of a URI. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 19:45:31 UTC