W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2011

Re: TAG work on SPDY

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:28:48 +0200
Message-ID: <4E80B650.1050205@gmx.de>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
CC: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2011-09-26 19:04, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On 09/26/2011 11:46 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2011-09-26 15:25, Jim Gettys wrote:
>>> ...
>>>       o lack of request #'s in responses, making out of order delivery
>>> problematic.
>>> ...
>> Clarifying: server and intermediates are not supposed to re-order
>> responses.
>> So is this about being able to better work around this kind of breakage?
> Not just the breakage: given what web sites have evolved into, I can see
> what caused the breakage.  Getting things back into order (given a
> complex back end) is hard.
> And the server may have better information  than the client what matters
> to get first, conceivably.

Me confused :-)

Out-of-order delivery is not allowed by RFC 2616 -- we should be clear 
about things that would be nice-to-have for debugging, and things that 
maybe should have been defined differently...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 26 September 2011 17:29:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:39 GMT