W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Question about CURIEs and SPARQL

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 16:34:14 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=_YLbgURZps+HvNrqg1RX1yUfUwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Thanks for the comments on the IR note. I should mention that I didn't
mean for comments to be sent to just me, but should be sent to
www-tag. The request to send to me was left over from earlier drafts
that were not out for wider review.

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Andy Seaborne
<andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> I didn't understand the sentence:
>
> [[
> However, SPARQL, Turtle, and RDFa are being extended to admit CURIEs that
> include #, making this a newly attractive option.
> ]]
>
> I can read that as CURIE syntax that can include a # as the output of the
> CURIE-to-IRI process, or that the CURIE syntax in SPARQL can include a hash.

I meant the latter...

> In the first case
>
> PREFIX ex <http://example/ns#>
> ...
>  { ?s ex: ?o }
> ....

You'd need a different prefix for each member of the big namespace,
which is not what anyone would want, I think.

> and in the second case
>
> PREFIX ex <http://example/>
> ...
>  { ?s ex:ns#frag ?o }
> ....
>
> SPARQL 1.1, Last Call, is not changing from the SPARQL 1.0 syntax where the
> second use is not allowed.

Oh well, too bad. I was being optimistically sloppy.  Thanks for catching this.

> # is the comment character in SPARQL.

Ah, this puts an even bigger hole in my plan. Turtle would have the
same problem. That just leaves RDFa, where a:b# is a valid CURIE.

Will repair the document.

Thanks
Jonathan
(tracker: ISSUE-57)

> (CURIEs post-date the SPARQL syntax which has lead to a bit of confusion -
> SPARQL talks about "prefixed names")
>
>        Andy
Received on Sunday, 29 May 2011 23:34:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:35 GMT