- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:00:05 +0100
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, Dan Appelquist <Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
>> I'm aware that this action is due today. We have a document that is >> partially completed and certainly done enough for a bit of >> discussion, available at: >> >> https://docs.google.com/View?id=dgnh4s67_2cv7hf5c7 Great stuff, thanks! Regarding the linking methods, you might want to take Amundsen's H Factor [1] into account? Cheers, Michael [1] http://amundsen.com/hypermedia/hfactor/ -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 29 Mar 2011, at 22:53, Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > > On 3/29/2011 5:07 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote: >> I'm aware that this action is due today. We have a document that is >> partially completed and certainly done enough for a bit of >> discussion, available at: >> >> https://docs.google.com/View?id=dgnh4s67_2cv7hf5c7 >> >> If there is time for it to be discussed on Thursday's call, all the >> better. > > Perfect timing. I'm just starting on the agenda now, and I'll put it > on. Based on a quick skim, it's an impressive start. Thank you! > > One comment: if working in Google Docs is helping you with a bit of > early collaboration I suppose that's OK for a little while, but it > seems to me that drafts for TAG publications really should live in > W3C space. That way, W3C can take responsibility for long-term > archiving, maintenance of stable URIs, etc. Might it be possible to > move this into W3C/TAG CVS space soon? I note the document also > lacks things like explicit copyright statements, which we also > normally would put explicitly into a draft that matches W3C > pubrules. Getting all that right would be good (some of us use > variations on the xmlspec.xsl template, which has its own pros and > cons), but either way I think having it in W3C space at least goes > some way to making it a de-facto W3C publication. > > Noah > > P.S. Dan, your out-of-office note suggested you'd be back today, and > I'm assuming you'll on the call this Thurs. Is that right? We're up > to two agenda items that focus on your work, and if you won't be > there then, combined with others' regrets, that might tip the scales > toward canceling the call. >
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2011 08:00:39 UTC