Re: URI vs http: URI from Julian Reschke on 2011-03-10 (www-tag@w3.org from March 2011)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:04:12 +0100
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4D79048C.4050404@gmx.de>

On 10.03.2011 17:28, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Just a pet peeve, please in the discussions, be careful about distinguishing between
> things that apply to URIs in general (or IRIs in general for that matter) vs things that
> apply specifically to HTTP URI as they are currently defined (where # is interpreted
> client side and ? is interpreted server side.)
> ...

But <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.3.5.p.5>:

"...As such, the fragment identifier is not used in the scheme-specific 
processing of a URI; instead, the fragment identifier is separated from 
the rest of the URI prior to a dereference, and thus the identifying 
information within the fragment itself is dereferenced solely by the 
user agent, regardless of the URI scheme..."

BR, Julian

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 17:05:01 UTC