W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2011

Re: URI vs http: URI

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:04:12 +0100
Message-ID: <4D79048C.4050404@gmx.de>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 10.03.2011 17:28, Larry Masinter wrote:
> Just a pet peeve, please in the discussions, be careful about distinguishing between
> things that apply to URIs in general (or IRIs in general for that matter) vs things that
> apply specifically to HTTP URI as they are currently defined (where # is interpreted
> client side and ? is interpreted server side.)
> ...

But <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.3.5.p.5>:

"...As such, the fragment identifier is not used in the scheme-specific 
processing of a URI; instead, the fragment identifier is separated from 
the rest of the URI prior to a dereference, and thus the identifying 
information within the fragment itself is dereferenced solely by the 
user agent, regardless of the URI scheme..."

BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 17:05:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:34 GMT