W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Issue-57

From: Xiaoshu Wang <xiao@renci.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:24:17 +0000
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA2A4C7B.114BF%xiao@renci.org>

On 6/24/11 2:06 PM, "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote:

>On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Xiaoshu Wang <xiao@renci.org> wrote:
>> I have stated my solutions many times. Here it is again:
>> Don't ask people to make inference from *how* a message is received. Ask
>> people to make assertions in the message *explicitly*, with more refined
>> terms suited to their intended granularity.
>You misunderstood me. I am *not* talking about whatever problem you
>think the above is a solution to. The problem to which I seek
>solutions is:
>given http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Fire
>how do I say (in RDF or equivalent):
>1. that the wiki page is licensed according to l1
>2. that Pale Fire is licensed according to l2
>without modifying either the wiki page or Pale Fire.
>It's not that hard; I just want to know concretely what others think,
>especially those who would jettison httpRange-14.

If http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Fire is used as it is:

wiki:Pale_Fire a ex:WebPage.
wiki:Pale_Fire ex:licence ex:l1.
wiki:Pale_Fire ex:topic <aURI> .
<aURI> a ex:Book.
<aURI> ex:licence ex:l2.

If http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Fire is used to refer the book, then

wiki:Pale_Fire a ex:Book.
wiki:Pale_Fire ex:licence ex:l2.
<aURI> ex:webPageOf wiki:Pale.
<aURI> ex:licence ex:l1.

Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 18:24:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:10 UTC