W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Issue-57

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:32:01 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTim9KZWhWw7gCAkcMhh1AnTtTf=ZUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xiaoshu Wang <xiao@renci.org>
Cc: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Xiaoshu Wang <xiao@renci.org> wrote:
>
> First, let me make this clear. I have never denied the problem you
> described here is not a problem. My argument has always been httpRange-14
> is a wrong solution to the problem.

What I have always heard you say is that httpRange-14 was not a
solution to any problem. That's a very different position. I'm glad
you've come around; getting you to agree that it *is* a solution,
however inadequate, was my only goal here.

> This is a significant jump. You are suggesting that an HTTP-URI references
> to a "Representation". I believe this is not what the current AWWW says. I
> believe this is, perhaps intensionally avoided, in the AWWW.

1. I did not suggest this.
2. Nothing in what I wrote here or elsewhere permits such a conclusion.
3. I have been extremely careful to avoid suggest this or enabling
such a conclusion.
4. This conversation is a repeat of others and you often make the same
illogical jump.

I don't think it is going to be productive for me to argue with
someone who puts words in my mouth; I would use all of my energy
taking them back out. Maybe we can take this up later when one of us
learns something new.

Jonathan
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 15:32:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:36 GMT