On 2011-06 -16, at 12:09, ashok malhotra wrote: > > On 6/16/2011 8:28 AM, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: >> That said, this leaves open that if we want to invent a 209 response where the response contains information ABOUT the thing identified by the URI but not its contents, that could be useful. > > Yes, we could do that but in the situation where there is a representation and some metadata, > you would never get a 209. So, I have been leaning toward a new getMetadata HTTP verb but > I've been told that this is too radical. > > That suffers from the fact that there is a whole lot of data which has no URI - you have to say "what you get by doing a HTTP FOO on the data URI 'http://...". You can't link to that, etc. SO it breaks web architecture by not giving the FOOable thing a URI. TimReceived on Thursday, 23 June 2011 02:13:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:36 GMT