- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:37:25 -0700
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote: > Noah > > As you may have noticed we have issued a Call For Consensus to publish the : "HTML5 Edition for Web Authors" as a first public Working Draft since we overlooked to do this previously. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0092.html > > In addition we have removed the "non-normative" text from the candidate document. > > We also plan to reformat this document as a W3C Working Draft if the CfC is successful. Given that we would then have two documents with normative status describing how HTML is defined. Which of the two is authoritative if the two don't agree? / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 19:38:22 UTC