W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2011

Re: ACTION-472: New Mime-web-info draft

From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:46:09 -0800
Message-ID: <4D435541.6090809@oracle.com>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
CC: nathan@webr3.org, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
I believe a registry implies some oversight.
All the best, Ashok

On 1/28/2011 3:28 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Nathan<nathan@webr3.org>  wrote:
>> This is possibly a stupid question, but why even have a registry, surely we
>> could just use the URI of the spec (dated/versioned)?
> Not a stupid question at all.  The TAG even has a name for the
> question: ISSUE-50. (Oddly, the issue's home page has a URI, but the
> issue itself doesn't have a URI.)
>
> Jonathan
>
Received on Friday, 28 January 2011 23:47:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:30 GMT