On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Jonathan Rees wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> The only exchange I recall was about the >> recombine-fragids-when-redirect-location-has-a-fragid issue. > > The message I was looking for was sent several years ago, communicated > possibly by Henry, following TAG discussion of the topic, and it said > something about how resource owners (or whomever) were responsible for > making sure that representations (such as those arising from conneg > parameter modulation) were consistent with one another. It didn't > mention fragids but IIRC could have been interpreted as applying to > them. The reference is here [1] no? I don't recall an exchange between ietf-http-wg and the TAG on that subject. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/#frag-coneg -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiƩu toujou t'entourneras. ~~YvesReceived on Friday, 14 January 2011 16:40:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:29 GMT