W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Feedback on Internet Media Types and the Web

From: Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:24:04 -0700
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20110207202404.2b027a6c.eric@bisonsystems.net>
Larry Masinter wrote:
> 
> For "+json" to be useful for anything, it has to mean something that
> everyone agrees to it meaning... and the only way we have of getting
> that agreement is to publish a document and put it through a
> consensus process (notwithstanding those who prefer the" willful
> violation" path).
>

Sure.  But first, the groundwork for such an effort must be laid, such
that it applies to +anything.  I'm talking about defining extensions in
the registry, not +json per se.

What's the counter-argument here, in favor of leaving extensions
undefined?

-Eric
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 03:24:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:30 GMT