- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:26:23 +0100
- To: "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Noah Mendelsohn" <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:51:42 +0100, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com> wrote: > My sincere apologies for any confusion caused. I tend to think of Last > Call as a somewhat internal W3C step (I.e. last call is for comments > from W3C working groups) on the way to a more visible CR, PR, or > whatever. That is actually not what Last Call is about per the W3C Process. When a Working Group advances to Last Call it is expected to have resolved its differences with other W3C Working Groups. Last Call is also very much for public review. Once a specification reaches Candidate Recommendation it is expected to not change much anymore so the public should definitely review it before that. http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call > So, I meant what you said, but obviously I wasn't as clear as I should > have been. I think we agree on what I intended as my main point: if > anyone is sufficiently unhappy to pursue their concerns with this, the > mechanism available is a formal objection. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 10:27:02 UTC