I think we've done enough fact finding to be prepared for discussion. I've marked ACTION-521 as PENDING REVIEW. Please give this a bit of thought, and we'll discuss at the F2F. For your convenience, I note that the two emails you should read to swap this back in are [1,2]. Thank you. Noah [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Aug/0039.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Aug/0044.html On 8/11/2011 11:28 AM, Noah Mendelsohn wrote: > > On 8/11/2011 10:38 AM, Norman Walsh wrote: >> If the TAG decides to take it foward, I'm happy to remain editor. But >> my feelings won't be hurt if you decide to appoint a current TAG >> member as the editor. Just doing what I can to be helpful. > > Very much appreciated. FWIW, I would strongly favor keeping at least your > name on as editor, since you in fact did most of the work. If we decide to > go forward, then whether or not to add an additional editor should depend > on how much further work is needed, I would think. Thanks again. > > NoahReceived on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 18:35:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:39 GMT