W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > August 2011

Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security

From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:38:15 -0700
Message-ID: <4E4D23D7.5080107@oracle.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org
Makes sense.  Perhaps go with the Wiki idea we have discussed.
And, perhaps a similar Wiki for Privacy?
All the best, Ashok

On 8/18/2011 6:54 AM, Larry Masinter wrote:
> My conclusion about ACTION-515 is that we shouldn't do the action ("publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security") but rather consider a different action, which is to draft a TAG security roadmap. I marked
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/515
>
> as pending review.  Perhaps we can discuss a TAG security roadmap (and other roadmaps we might want to produce) at the F2F?
>
> Larry
> --
> http://larry.masinter.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:tlr@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:06 PM
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Cc: Thomas Roessler; Mark Nottingham; Larry Masinter; John Kemp; Tobias Gondrom; Noah Mendelsohn
> Subject: Re: ACTION-515 and ACTION-516: Publishing John Kemp's TAG work on security
>
> On Aug 9, 2011, at 21:41 , Tobias Gondrom wrote:
>> actually am not quite sure about the purpose of this document and how I can help.
>> Agree with Mark, the page is a basic introduction, but the aspired value and for whom and why is not clear to me.
>>
>> If work/input is needed to help the IAB/TAG on the security topic or wiki pages, please let me know (with link to wiki/work item and aspired goals/results).
>>
>> Btw. just fyi: a somewhat related doc in websec is http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hodges-websec-framework-reqs-00.txt (where we try to define requirements to be used by websec and W3C WebAppSec). But still very rough, i.e. work in progress.
> Another related document is, of course, the excellent Browser Security Handbook:
> 	http://code.google.com/p/browsersec/wiki/Main
>
> I'd recommend to review the existing documents first and to find out what exactly the TAG is trying to add to those.
>
>
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2011 14:38:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:39 GMT