- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:26:40 -0400
- To: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni.tennison@googlemail.com>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org> wrote: > I'm probably missing something here, but in the context of the preceding > text, esp. the distinction between cases B and C, this seems to discourage > the common(?) practice of publishing both HTML and RDF at the same URI, > selectable by conneg? > > (My take has generally been that in such cases hypertext and RDF should > generally describe the same things, for human- and machine- consumption > respectively.) That's been my take as well, and the 303 URIs forwarding to One Generic Document pattern as documented in the Cool URIs for the Semantic Web Note [1] gives it the green flag I think. //Ed [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 13:27:08 UTC