- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:43:17 +0200
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <noah@arcanedomain.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 30.09.2010 14:06, Julian Reschke wrote: > ... > Bugs 10804 and 10805 have been rejected, so I have raised issues > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/125 and > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/126. > > Bug 9628 (which asks for clarification what the incompatibility with RFC > 2616 is) *has* been fixed, which is a good thing. I wish the spec did > the same for all other "willful violations". > ... Sorry, I got confused by too many bugs. 9628 was partly resolved (it mentioned three violations of RFC 2616, one of which was fixed). For the two remaining ones I raised the new bugs *10805* and *10806*, which were rejected, and I thus escalated them to the tracker issues 125 and 126. Bug 10804 was a request to actually state how the spec violates RFC 2616, and that one was thankfully fixed. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 12:50:44 UTC