- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:26:25 -0400
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote: > If rdf:ID is defined as having uniqueness constraints then it is surely broken for > RDF as the same thing can of course be referred to in lots of of places > in the file, with exactly the same syntax. Well... no. You have to use rdf:about the other times. -Alan > > Tim > >> >> >> >> Jonathan Rees wrote: >>> [...] The RDF/XML DTD >>> (http://www.w3.org/XML/9710rdf-dtd/rdf.dtd) gives the rdf:ID attribute >>> type ID, and the XML specs (including xml:id and Xpointer) do their >>> very best to ensure that attributes with type ID are as much as >>> possible the same as xml:id. The RDF/XML spec also makes rdf:ID very >>> similar to xml:id - same syntactic and uniqueness constraints. So it >>> seemed highly likely to me that rdf:ID defines fragids the same way >>> that xml:id does. > >
Received on Monday, 11 October 2010 13:27:16 UTC