- From: (unknown charset) Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:26:28 +0100
- To: (unknown charset) Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: (unknown charset) Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>, "Martin J. (unknown charset) Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, www-tag@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alan Ruttenberg writes:
> Do you have a more specific pointer to the relevant section in
> XPointer so I can have that for future reference?
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/#shorthand
> Also, is there any formal connection between the current XML schema
> document and the spec? If not, it's a bit odd that W3C should serve
> anything at all about this, and I would even recommend that it be
> considered for removal.
I can't immediately find _any_ DTD or XML Schema for the XML
serialisation of RDF on the W3C site. The only one with any real
status I found is a non-normative RELAX-NG one [1], which does _not_
identify rdf:ID as an ID. . .
(The one referenced by Jonathan [2] is a) 13 years old and b) isn't
even pointed to by the spec. it claims to be part of -- I don't think
it has any standing at all. . .)
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/#section-RELAXNG-Schema
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/9710rdf-dtd/rdf.dtd
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFMr4yJkjnJixAXWBoRAhlPAJ99Js3NRXjqFQ6bSHve4reKIGA0LQCggzrx
j7n1nB/BjhcoPSKwSxh8uHM=
=gfxC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 8 October 2010 21:27:40 UTC