W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2010

Re: ACTION-352 (related to Web Application Architecture)

From: John Kemp <john@jkemp.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:40:20 -0500
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-Id: <DDD5EB0A-5E24-409D-A7DB-0486BC7B2CF4@jkemp.net>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Hi Dan,

On Mar 9, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 06:43 -0500, John Kemp wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I finally completed ACTION-352 ("Integrate whiteboard drawings into a prose document about ways to distribute applications") by writing a document called "A Taxonomy of Web Applications" at http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/03/web-apps-taxonomy/web-apps-taxonomy.html
>> 
>> Comments are much appreciated.
> 
> Nice.
> 
> I think including a few specific deployed examples would improve it.

Sure... I can do that.

> 
> In the Client-side Static case... my understanding of widgets
> is that they're carefully isolated; i.e. there are no mash-ups.

Yes, I agree with that. I had originally put the word "mash-up" in quotes on that picture, but I decided I would then have to explain the difference between the quoted "mash-up" and the unquoted mash-up on the other pages ;) 

> So an example of one of these mash-ups would be particularly
> helpful to me.

I think the point is that the client (widget platform) becomes itself a relatively static mashup of widgets.

> 
> p.s. What diagramming tool did you use?

Um, just Powerpoint, converted to jpegs.

> Oops... the headings
> are part of the diagrams... I can't select the text.

Sorry - I usually use ASCII art diagrams, but that would have been too twisted for this, I think.

Regards,

- johnk

> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2010 15:47:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:20 GMT